Northern Laramie Range Alliance v. FERC
Northern Laramie Range Alliance v. FERC No. 12-9567 Denial of request that FERC revoke qualifying facility status of two wind facilities; whether facilities are close enough together to warrant consideration collectively for purpose of 80 MW size limit.
Black Oak Energy LLC, et al. v. FERC
Black Oak Energy LLC, et al. v. FERC No. 08-1386, et al. Complaint concerning PJM implementation of marginal line loss methodology with respect to virtual traders; payment and timing of refunds. Black Oak Energy, L.L.C., et al. v.
North Carolina Utils. Comm’n v. FERC
North Carolina Utils. Comm’n v. FERC No. 12-1881 Transmission rate incentives, awarding a return on equity adder to base ROE for various transmission enhancement projects. Virginia Electric and Power Co., 124 FERC ¶ 61,207 (2008), reh’g denied, 139 FERC ¶ 61,143 (2012). Circuit 4th Cir.
TC Ravenswood, LLC, et al. v. FERC
TC Ravenswood, LLC, et al. v. FERC No. 12-1008, et al. Updates to the demand curve rates for the installed capacity (ICAP) market administered by the New York ISO; timing and level of new rates. New York Indep.
Thomas J. Andersen v. FERC
Thomas J. Andersen v. FERC No. 12-72266 Erosion along the shoreline of Lake Helena, part of Missouri-Madison Project 2188; allegation that licensee failed to monitor and control ice movement and ice heaving affecting Mr. Anderson’s property adjacent to Lake Helena.
PPL EnergyPlus, LLC v. FERC
PPL EnergyPlus, LLC v. FERC No.
Electric Power Supply Ass’n, et al. v. FERC
Electric Power Supply Ass’n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 11-1486, et al.
In re Minisink Residents for Preservation of the Environment and Safety
In re Minisink Residents for Preservation of the Environment and Safety No. 12-1390 Commission’s opposition to motion to stay of construction of natural gas compressor close to residential homes. Circuit D.C. Cir.
City of Anaheim, Cal., et al. v. FERC
City of Anaheim, Cal., et al. v. FERC Nos. 11-1442 Order characterizing South of Lugo Transmission Path as a zonal, rather than local, constraint, spreading costs to all utilities in the SP-15 zone, not just to Southern California Edison, but also to municipals. California Indep.
Southern California Edison Co. v. FERC
Southern California Edison Co. v. FERC Nos. 11-1471 Order approving a base return on equity of 9.54 percent for Southern California Edison’s transmission projects; selection of median rather than midpoint within zone of reasonableness.