Search Results

County of Butte, Cal. v. FERC No. 10-70140 Denial of complaint that California DWR, licensee for the Oroville Project in Butte County, California, was in violation of recreation and public safety requirements of its hydroelectric license. County of Butte, Cal. v. Cal. Dept.

Texas Pipeline Ass'n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 10-60066, et al.

Summit Lake Paiute Tribe, et al. v. FERC Nos. 10-1389 and 10-1407 Opposition to motion for stay of pipeline construction pending judicial review. Circuit D.C. Cir.

Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General for the State of CT, et al. and Public Citizen, Inc., et al. Nos.

Petersburg Municipal Power & Light v. FERC No. 10-1096 Issuance of preliminary permit to City of Angoon, after lottery to select among same-day filings by multiple applicants, to study Ruth Lake Project in Alaska.

Alcoa Power Generating Inc. v. FERC No. 10-1066 Denial of petition for declaratory order, finding that State of North Carolina timely acted on application for Clean Water Act section 401 water quality certification within one year.

MarkWest Michigan Pipeline Co. v. FERC No. 10-1075 Rejection of indexed rate increase for oil pipeline that is inconsistent with 2006 settlement and applicable regulations. MarkWest Michigan Pipeline Co., L.L.C., 126 FERC ¶ 61,300 (2009), reh’g denied, 130 FERC ¶ 61,084 (2010). Circuit D.C.

New York Regional Interconnect v. FERC No. 09-1309 Conditional acceptance of New York ISO transmission planning process, submitted in compliance with Order No. 890; eligibility of new transmission projects for cost allocation and recovery. New York Indep.

Dynegy Midwest Generation, et al. v. FERC Nos. 09-1306, et al. Acceptance of Schedule 2-A, revising Midwest ISO open access transmission tariff to institute zone-based compensation to transmission owners for reactive power.

Northern Natural Gas Co. v. FERC No. 09-1252 Order on remand from Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC, 513 F.3d 242 (D.C. Cir.