Search Results

Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC No. 13-60140 Bandwidth calculations and remedies to keep Entergy companies in rough equalization under System Agreement; consideration of depreciation inputs and costs. Entergy Services, Inc., Op. No. 514, 137 FERC ¶ 61,029 (2011), reh’g denied, Op. No.

FirstEnergy Service Co. v. FERC No. 12-1461 PJM allocation to new member (ATSI) a share of the costs of high voltage regional transmission expansion projects that were planned prior to the new member’s integration into PJM. American Transmission Systems, Inc.; FirstEnergy Serv. Co. v.

Calif., ex rel, Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, et al. v. FERC No. 12-71958 Order on remand from State of California, ex rel. Bill Lockyer v. FERC, 383 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir.

Delaware Riverkeeper Network, et al. v. FERC No. 13-1015 Certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. to upgrade existing pipeline system with 40 miles of pipeline looping.

West Deptford Energy, LLC v. FERC No. 12-1340 Assignment of costs of already-constructed network upgrade to interconnecting generator, based on tariff language and cost allocation policy. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., 136 FERC ¶ 61,195 (2011), reh’g denied, 139 FERC ¶ 61,184 (2012). Circuit D.C.

News Release:

May 2, 2018

Report

PSEG Cos., et al. v. FERC No.

New Jersey Bd. of Pub. Utils., et al. v. FERC No. 11-4245, et al.

BNP Paribas Energy Trading v. FERC No. 12-1242 Allocation of Transco’s cost of purchasing base gas in storage, needed to pressurize the reservoir to support top gas entitlements, between historic and new shippers. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Opinion No.

New England Power Generators, et al. v. FERC No. 12-1060, et al. Various tariff revisions to redesign New England Forward Capacity Market. ISO New England, Inc., et al., 131 FERC ¶ 61,065 (2010), orders on reh’g, 132 FERC ¶ 61,122 (2010), 135 FERC ¶ 61,029 (2011), and 138 FERC ¶ 61,027 (2012).