Search Results

Cal. Pub. Utils. Comm’n v. FERC No. 13-74361 Denial of interlocutory appeal of ALJ’s decision not to hold FERC proceeding in abeyance, concerning recovery of wildfire costs from ratepayers, until decision in CPUC proceeding.

Pub. Serv. Comm’n of New York v. FERC No. 13-2316 Approval of modifications to definition of “bulk electric system” developed by NERC, and approval of procedures to add or remove facilities from the bulk electric system on a case-by-case basis.

Elec. Power Supply Ass’n v. FERC Nos. 11-1486, et al. Motion to stay issuance of mandate Circuit D.C. Cir.

PSEG Cos., et al. v. FERC No.

Tesoro Alaska Co., et al. v. FERC No. 13-1248, et al. Approval of contested settlement, addressing cost pooling among owners of the Trans Alaska Pipeline System. BP Pipelines (Alaska) Inc., et al., 144 FERC ¶ 61,025 (2013). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC No. 13-1278 Order on remand from Missouri Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC, 601 F.3d 581 (D.C. Cir.

Central Hudson Gas & Elec., et al. v. FERC Approval of new capacity zone in New York; redefinition of demand curves in New York installed capacity market. New York Indep.

Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC No. 13-60784 Implementation of bandwidth remedy based on calendar year 2008 data – third annual bandwidth proceeding; consideration of various inputs to formula. Entergy Services, Inc., Op. No.

Turlock Irrigation Dist., et al. v. FERC Nos. 13-1250, et al. Determination that licensing is required for unlicensed 4.9 MW La Grange Project, on the Tuolumne River in California, because of findings based on navigability, federal lands, and post-1935 construction. Turlock Irrigation Dist.

Electric Power Supply Ass’n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 11-1486, et al. Petition for rehearing en banc.