Search Results

ExxonMobil Oil Corp, et al. v. FERC No. 07-1163, et al. Dismissal of complaints alleging that SFPP's indexed rate increases for 2005, 2006 and 2007 substantially exceeded its actual cost increases. BP West Coast Products, LLC, et al. v.

North Star Steel Co., LLC v. FERC (Supplemental Brief) No. 07-73550 Denial of complaint, finding that FERC lacks jurisdiction over request for refunds to a retail customer of Arizona Electric Power Cooperative during 2000-2001 energy crisis. North Star Steel Co. v.

Jackson County, North Carolina, et al. v. FERC No. 08-1224 Environmental review and water quality certification issues concerning FERC approval of a surrender of license for 225 kW Dillsboro Project on Tuckasegee River in Jackson County, NC, and removal of project dam and powerhouse.

Union Power Partners v. FERC No. 08-1252 Affirmance of ALJ that Union does not have a contractual right under its interconnection agreement with Entergy to compensation for reactive power. Union Power Partners, L.P., 120 FERC ¶ 61,284 (2007), reh'g denied, 123 FERC ¶ 61,191 (2008). Circuit D.C.

American Gas Ass'n v. FERC No. 08-1266 Revisions to financial forms, statements and reports for natural gas companies, contained in FERC Form Nos. 2, 2-A, and 3-Q, to enhance their usefulness by updating market and cost information.

Conn. Dept. of Pub. Util. Control v. FERC No. 08-1199 Return on equity rate component sought by Transmission Owners in conjunction with establishment of ISO New England as a Regional Transmission Organization; 100 ROE basis point adder for new transmission constructed by Dec. 31, 2008.

American Electric Power Serv. Corp. v. FERC No. 07-1275, et al. Rates for reactive power service by Calpine Oneta, which owns a generating facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma, interconnected with AEP, to Southwest Power Pool.

SFPP v. FERC and United States No. 08-1110 Order affirming ALJ's initial decision on 2 issues reserved by settlement, concerning validity of unfiled contracts under the Interstate Commerce Act and reparations to shippers. SFPP, L.P., 122 FERC ¶ 61,126 (2008). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Piedmont Environmental Council, et al. v. FERC Nos. 07-1651,et al. Petition for rehearing en banc; Regulations implementing sec. 1221 of Energy Policy Act, adding new FPA sec.

TNA Merchant Projects Inc. v. FERC No. 08-1201 Proposed rate for reactive power and voltage control service; treatment of filing as a rate change subject to suspension and refund. Chehalis Power Generating L.P., 112 FERC ¶ 61,144 (2005), reh'g denied, 113 FERC ¶ 61,259 (2005). Circuit D.C.