Williams Gas Processing, et al. v. FERC
Williams Gas Processing, et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-1179, et al. Reassertion of "in connection with" NGA jurisdiction over gathering rates charged for services provided on offshore North Padres Island facilities; finding of OCSLA violations. Shell Offshore, Inc. v.
MW ISO Transmission Owners, et al. v. FERC
MW ISO Transmission Owners, et al. v. FERC No. 03-1163 Denial of reconsideration of decision to charge costs under Schedule 10 of the Midwest ISO OATT to grandfathered wholesale load outside of ISO. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, 103 FERC ¶ 61,038 (2003). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Cal. Indep. System Operator, et al. v. FERC
Cal. Indep. System Operator, et al. v. FERC Nos. 02-1287, et al. Directive that California ISO replace existing stakeholder Board with independent, non-stakeholder Board. Mirant Delta, et al., 100 FERC ¶ 61,059 (2002), order on reh'q, 100 FERC ¶ 61,271 (2002). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. FERC
Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. FERC Nos. 03-1025, et al. Approval, as modified, of Cal. PX's "wind up" rate and allocation of administrative costs among market participants.
National Comm. for the New River v. FERC
National Comm. for the New River v. FERC No. 03-1111 Authorization of the Patriot Project, expanding East Tennessee's mainline facilities in Tennessee, Virginia, and North Carolina. East Tennessee Natural Gas Co., 101 FERC ¶ 61,188 (2002), order on reh'q, 102 FERC ¶ 61,225 (2003). Circuit D.C.
MW ISO Transmission Owners, et al. v. FERC
MW ISO Transmission Owners, et al. v. FERC Nos. 02-1121, et al. Decision that the Midwest ISO Schedule 10 cost adder should include in its calculation all loads (including bundled retail and grandfathered wholesale load) using the regional grid that the ISO operates.
Gas Transmission Northwest Corp. v. FERC
Gas Transmission Northwest Corp. v. FERC No. 03-1166 Declining to waive interim shippers' right-of-first-refusal protections in the course of conditionally approving a pipeline's pre-arranged deal proposal.
Entergy Services, Inc. v. FERC
Entergy Services, Inc. v. FERC No. 03-1027 Finding that Entergy violated OATT and Order 888 by reserving transmission capacity at key interfaces based on alleged reliability needs of bundled retail customers. Aquila Power Corp. v.
Consumers Energy Co. v. FERC
Consumers Energy Co. v. FERC No. 03-1162 Approval of market-based rates for Canadian power marketer; dispute whether affiliated utility offers comparable open access transmission service.
Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. FERC
Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. FERC No. 03-1026 Imposition of mandatory fishway prescription at the request of Dept. of Interior under FPA ' 18, despite EA's finding that fish passage facilities are neither technically nor economically feasible.