Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-72874, et al. Approval of settlement agreements between FERC Staff, Reliant and Duke; denial of late intervention and party status to California Parties and other movants.
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC
Pacific Gas and Electric Co., et al. v. FERC Nos. 04-70635, et al. Approval and denial of procedures under ISO Amendment No. 51 to complete re-runs of its settlement system so that it will be able to do the re-run ordered in the California refund proceeding.
Alternate Power Source, Inc. v. FERC
Alternate Power Source, Inc. v. FERC No. 03-1398 Denial of complaint that pass-through of certain charges under wholesale power supply contract violated tariff and open access rules, and was unduly discriminatory. Alternate Power Source, Inc. v. Western Mass.
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC
Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC Nos. 03-1340, et al. Directive that Burlington refund Kansas ad valorem taxes to Northern Natural and Panhandle on sales of natural gas; effect of earlier settlements.
Jupiter Energy Corp. v. FERC
Jupiter Energy Corp. v. FERC No. 04-60041 Finding that offshore natural gas pipeline facilities remain jurisdictional transmission facilities, and denying requests for abandonment authorization and rescission of certificates.
PUD No. 1 of Snohomish County v. FERC
PUD No. 1 of Snohomish County v. FERC Nos. 03-72511, et al. Denial of complaints seeking modification of bilateral contracts in Western wholesale power forward markets; rehearing of applicable standard of review (public interest or j+r?). Nevada Power Co., et al. v.
Arizona Corp. Comm'n, et al. v. FERC
Arizona Corp. Comm'n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-1206, et al. Modification of El Paso's settlement, tariff, and contracts to assign contract demand rights to shippers and restore firm service on the El Paso system.
James M. Knott, et al. v. FERC
James M. Knott, et al. v. FERC Nos. 00-1909, et al. Requirement to install streamflow gages and submit microfilm cards of flood flow modulator drawings; finding that Riverdale Mills Project, on the Blackstone River in Massachusetts, is subject to FERC's mandatory licensing jurisdiction. James M.
Edison Mission Energy, Inc., et al. v. FERC
Edison Mission Energy, Inc., et al. v. FERC No. 03-1228 Approval of comprehensive market power mitigation plan for New York, including Automated Mitigation Procedure. New York Independent System Operator, Inc., et al., 99 FERC ¶ 61,246 (2002), order on reh'g, 103 FERC ¶ 61,291 (2003).