Search Results

East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. FERC No. 06-1090 Order, affirming ALJ after hearing, that East Texas is not entitled to credits under CSW open access transmission tariff for transmission facilities that East Texas claims are integrated with the CSW transmission system.

Transm. Agency of Northern Cal. v. FERC Nos. 05-1402, et al. Orders on remand from PG&E v. FERC, 306 F.3d 1112 (D.C. Cir.

Midwest Region Gas Task Force Ass'n v. FERC Nos. 05-1468, et al. Acceptance of discounted rate agreements, subject to certain conditions.

State Water Contractors, et al. v. FERC No. 06-74506 Commission affirmed that the California ISO's Transmission Access Charge, designed to recover embedded cost of the ISO-controlled grid, was just and reasonable despite rate methodology not being time-sensitive.

Petal Gas Storage, L.L.C., et al. v. FERC Nos. 04-1166, et al.

East Kentucky Power Cooperative v. FERC No. 06-1003 Conditional acceptance of new provision (Schedule 23) of MISO Tariff, allowing recovery by transmission owners from customers of costs under specified grandfathered agreements carved-out of MISO energy markets.

Wisconsin Public Power, Inc., et al. v. FERC Nos. 04-1414, et al Implementation of Midwest ISO "Day 2" energy markets (day-ahead and real-time) and financial transmission rights market; treatment of transmission service provided under grandfathered agreements in Midwest ISO energy markets.

Colorado Off. of Consumer Counsel v. FERC No. 04-1238 Conditions (Market Behavior Rules) on all new and existing market-based rate tariffs and authorizations to include a prohibition against anticompetitive behavior and the exercise of market power.

Conn. Dept. of Public Utility Control v. FERC No. 05-1411 Acceptance of ISO-NE's proposed Installed Capacity Requirements for the 2005/2006 power year; whether agency has statutory authority to regulate ICAP requirements.

City of Fall River, Mass., et al. v. FERC Nos. 06-1203, et al.