Search Results

Cogeneration Ass'n of California v. FERC No. 06-1178 Setting of standby customer transmission rates, based on adjusted contract demand using a probabilistic methodology rather than using the 12 coincident peak methodology. Pacific Gas and Electric Co., Op. No.

Gas Transmission, Northwest Corp. v. FERC Nos. 03-1257, et al. Creditworthiness and collateral requirements for pipeline shippers. North Baja Pipeline, LLC et al., 115 FERC ¶ 61,141 (2006) and 117 FERC ¶ 61,146 (2006); e prime, Inc. v.

Southern California Edison Co. v. FERC No. 06-1202 Denial of rate filing intended to recover additional interconnection costs after contractual deadline for such filing. Southern California Edison Co., 113 FERC ¶ 61,018 (2005), reh'g denied, 115 FERC ¶ 61,100 (2006). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Fall River Rural Electric Coop. v. FERC No. 06-71944 Dismissal of application of Fall River for a proposed hydroelectric project located at an existing dam included in license earlier issued to PPL Montana, on the ground that it would substantially interfere with PPL's license.

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. FERC Nos. 06-1025, et al. On remand from Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. FERC, 347 F.3d 964 (D.C.

Xcel Energy Services Inc. v. FERC No. 06-1174 Denial of waiver of prior notice and filing requirement, for late filing of generator interconnection agreements long after their effectiveness. Xcel Energy Services, Inc., 114 FERC ¶ 61,295 (2006), denying reh'g of 12/23/05 unpublished letter order.

Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Co. v. FERC No. 06-1145 Order, affirming ALJ, that Williston must convert nature of transportation service to Northern States Power and that Williston must increase NSP's Annual Delivery Quantity under transportation contract.

Illinois Municipal Gas Agency, et al. v. FERC Nos. 06-1006, et al. Reaffirmance of policy permitting selective rate discounting, on a non-discriminatory basis, in order to meet competition.

Keyspan LNG, L.P. v. FERC No. 06-1097 Denial, based on safety concerns, of proposal by KeySpan to site, construct and operate a LNG import terminal in Providence, Rhode Island. KeySpan LNG, L.P., et al., 112 FERC ¶ 61,028 (2005), reh'g denied, 114 FERC ¶ 61,054 (2006). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Burlington Resources Oil & Gas v. FERC No. 06-1042 Order on remand from Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. v. FERC, 396 F.3d 405 (D.C. Cir. 2005), again finding that Burlington must refund Kansas ad valorem taxes to pipelines on first sales of natural gas. Burlington Res.