Search Results

San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. FERC No.

City of Oberlin, et al. v. FERC Nos. 18-1248 and 18-1261 Conditional certificate authorizing construction and operation of NEXUS pipeline project in Ohio and Michigan. NEXUS Gas Transmission LLC, et al., 160 FERC ¶ 61,022 (2017), order on reh’g, 164 FERC ¶ 61,054 (2018). Circuit D.C. Cir.

FERC v. Powhatan Energy Fund, et al. No. 18-2326 Appeal from 9/24/18 district court ruling (Judge Lauck, E.D. Va.), denying motion to dismiss, that FERC enforcement action is not barred by federal statute of limitations. Circuit 4th Cir.

El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. FERC No. 18-1183 Orders, following hearing and ALJ decision, on various ratemaking issues (raised by both pipeline and shippers) in El Paso general rate case. El Paso Natural Gas Co., Op. No.

In re: Siskiyou County Water Users Ass’n No.

Otsego 2000, et al. v. FERC No. 18-1188 Order authorizing construction and operation of certain compression and related natural gas facilities (the New Market Project) in various counties within New York.

Lori Birckhead, et al. v. FERC No. 18-1218 Order authorizing construction and operation of gas compression facilities in Kentucky, Tennessee, and W. Virginia, referred to as the Broad Run Expansion Project.

Missouri River Energy Services v. FERC No. 18-1166 Finding that Missouri River, Basin Electric, and Heartland are not eligible for an exemption from congestion charges and marginal losses (carve-out treatment) under the Southwest Power Pool open access tariff.

Adorers of the Blood of Christ, United States Province, et al. v. FERC, et al. No. 18-548 Response in opposition to petition for certiorari seeking review of Adorers of the Blood of Christ v. FERC, 897 F.3d 187 (3d Cir. 2018).

Southwest Airlines Co., et al. v. FERC No. 18-1134, 18-1136, 18-1137 and 18-1138 Orders on complaints by shippers concerning index rate increases for certain SFPP lines. HollyFrontier Refining & Marketing LLC, et al. v.