Search Results

City of Rockingham, NC, et al. v. FERC No. 15-2535 Issuance of new license for the continued operation and maintenance of the 108 MW Yadkin-Pee Dee Hydroelectric Project on the Yadkin and Pee Dee Rivers in North Carolina.

TNA Merchant Projects, Inc. v. FERC No. 13-1008, et al. Rates for reactive power service to Bonneville Power Administration; continued treatment of filing as a rate change subject to suspension and refund.

Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. FERC No. 16-1014 Dismissal of complaint concerning depreciation component of bandwidth formula rate in Entergy System Agreement; Entergy’s proposed depreciation rates for Entergy Arkansas. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. Entergy Corp., et al., Op.

Delaware Riverkeeper Network, et al. v. FERC Civ. Action No. 16-cv-416 (TSC) Reply in support of motion to dismiss complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Circuit D.D.C.

Allco Renewable Energy v. Mass. Elec., et al. No. 15-13515 Amicus brief, filed at the invitation of the district court, concerning regulations of the Mass. Dept. of Pub. Utils.

Orangeburg, South Carolina v. FERC No. 15-1274 Conditional acceptance of joint dispatch agreement following Duke/Progress merger; whether agreement and NC Commission favor native load sales to the disfavor of sales to Orangeburg. Duke Energy Corp.

El Paso Natural Gas Co., L.L.C. v. FERC No. 15-1323 Orders, following hearing and ALJ decision, on various reserved ratemaking issues in El Paso general rate case. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 139 FERC ¶ 61,095 (2012), order on reh’g and compl., 152 FERC ¶ 61,039 (2015). Circuit D.C. Cir.

Transm. Agency of N. Cal., et al. v. FERC No. 15-1057, et al. Denial of complaint, alleging an anticipatory breach of PG&E’s obligations under agreement providing for coordinated operation of high-voltage transmission line (California-Oregon Intertie). Transmission Agency of Northern Cal. v.

Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. FERC No. 15-1450 Order on complaint, concerning interpretation and application of FPL open access transmission tariff provision concerning charges for energy imbalance service. Seminole Elec. Coop., Inc. v.

Portland General Electric, et al. v. FERC No. 15-1237, et al. Order granting complaint to the extent utility has an obligation to purchase wind facility’s entire net output at avoided cost rates. PáTu Wind Farm, LLC v.