PUD No. 1 of Snohomish County v. FERC
PUD No. 1 of Snohomish County v. FERC Nos. 03-72511, et al. Denial of complaints seeking modification of bilateral contracts in Western wholesale power forward markets; rehearing of applicable standard of review (public interest or j+r?). Nevada Power Co., et al. v.
Arizona Corp. Comm'n, et al. v. FERC
Arizona Corp. Comm'n, et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-1206, et al. Modification of El Paso's settlement, tariff, and contracts to assign contract demand rights to shippers and restore firm service on the El Paso system.
James M. Knott, et al. v. FERC
James M. Knott, et al. v. FERC Nos. 00-1909, et al. Requirement to install streamflow gages and submit microfilm cards of flood flow modulator drawings; finding that Riverdale Mills Project, on the Blackstone River in Massachusetts, is subject to FERC's mandatory licensing jurisdiction. James M.
Edison Mission Energy, Inc., et al. v. FERC
Edison Mission Energy, Inc., et al. v. FERC No. 03-1228 Approval of comprehensive market power mitigation plan for New York, including Automated Mitigation Procedure. New York Independent System Operator, Inc., et al., 99 FERC ¶ 61,246 (2002), order on reh'g, 103 FERC ¶ 61,291 (2003).
PUC of California, et al. v. FERC
Nos. 03-74207, et al.
Entergy Services, Inc. v. FERC
Entergy Services, Inc. v. FERC No. 03-1271 Requirement that Entergy refund to QF host loads all charges collected under its "schedules first" policy. Entergy Services, Inc., et al., 103 FERC ¶ 61,125 (2003), reh'q denied, 104 FERC ¶ 61,061 (2003). Circuit D.C. Cir.
Golden Northwest Aluminum, Inc., et al. v. BPA and FERC
Golden Northwest Aluminum, Inc., et al. v. BPA and FERC Nos. 03-73426, et al. Confirmation and approval of Bonneville Power Administration's proposed 5-year power rates, commencing Oct.
Midwest ISO, et al. v. FERC
Midwest ISO, et al. v. FERC Nos. 03-1238, et al. Denial of petition for rulemaking seeking revision to the way the Commission collects electric annual charges (based on volume of electricity transmission rather than sales).
Borough of Olyphant, Pennsylvania v. FERC
Borough of Olyphant, Pennsylvania v. FERC No. 03-1284 Interpretation of settlement agreement between PPL and wholesale requirements customers, concerning recovery of retail stranded costs. PPL Electric Utilities Corp., 101 FERC 61,370 (2002), order on reh'g, 104 FERC 61,259 (2003). Circuit D.C.