Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FERC Form No. 714 (2000) |
Annual Electric Control and Planning Area Report For the
Year Ending FERC
FORM NO. 714 |
Form Approved OMB Numbers: 1902 - 0140 (Expires: |
This report is mandatory under the Federal Power Act,
and is a regulatory support requirement as provided by 18 C.F.R. §141.51. Failure to comply may result in criminal
fines, civil penalties and other sanctions as provided by law. Information reported on the FERC Form No. 714
is not considered confidential.
Questions concerning this report will be answered by: Ms. Meesha M. Bond
(202) 208-1414 or form714@ferc.fed.us.
This form consists of: Part I, Identification and
Certification; Part II, comprising Schedules 1 through 6; Part III, comprising
Schedules 1 and 2; and Part IV, Notes.
All respondents are to complete Parts I and IV. Part II is to be completed by each electric
utility or group of electric utilities which operates a control area. Part III is to be completed by each electric
utility or group of electric utilities which constitute a planning area
and has an annual peak demand that is greater than 200 MW. An electric utility is a corporation, person,
agency, authority, or other legal entity or instrumentality that owns and/or
operates facilities within the
Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 50 hours per response, including time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. Send comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this burden to Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Office of the Chief Information Officer, CI-1, 888 First Street,
N.E., Washington, DC 20426; and to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. You shall not be penalized for failure to
respond to this collection of information unless the collection of information
displays a valid OMB control number.
List of Schedules
Part I: Identification
and Certification
Part II: Control
Area Information
Schedule
1: Generating Plants Included in
Reporting Control Area
Schedule
2: Control Area Monthly Capabilities at
Time of
Schedule
3: Control Area Net Energy for Load and
Peak Demand Sources by Month
Schedule
4: Adjacent Control Area
Interconnections
Schedule
5: Control Area Scheduled and Actual
Interchange
Schedule
6: Control Area Hourly System Lambda
Part III: Planning
Area Information
Schedule
1: Electric Utilities that Compose the
Planning Area
Schedule
2: Planning Area Hourly Demand and
Forecast Summer and
Part IV: Notes
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission FERC Form No. 714
(1999) |
Annual Electric Control and Planning Area Report For the
Year Ending |
|
|
Part I - |
|||
1. Respondent
Identification: Code: 12825 Name:
NorthWestern Energy 2. Respondent
Type: (Please check appropriate box and fill in name) [ X
] Part I: Control Area (Complete Parts I, II and IV) Control Area Name: [ X
] Part II: Planning Area (Complete Parts I, III and IV) Planning Area Name: |
3. Respondent
Mailing Address: Ernie
Kindt NorthWestern Energy 40
East Broadway 4. Contact
Person: Name: Ernie Kindt Title: V.P., Chief
Accounting Officer Telephone #: (406)497-2759 Ext. direct 5. Certifying
Official: Name: LeRoy
Patterson Title: Director, System Operations Signature: ________________ Date: _______ |
||
Return
Completed Form to: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Form
No. 714 Room
8B-06 888 |
|||
Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission FERC Form No. 714
(1999) |
Annual Electric Control and Planning Area Report For the
Year Ending |
Please Type: Utility Code
12825 Utility Name NorthWestern Energy |
||||
Part II - Schedule 1. Generating Plants Included in Reporting
Control Area (Use
continuation sheets if needed) |
||||||
Under the name of its operating electric utility, list
all generating plants (1) within the respondent's control area which are
controlled, metered or for which the required information is otherwise
available to control area operators and (2) dynamically scheduled plants or
units outside the control area.
Specifically identify dynamically scheduled plants. Report only plant totals with generators in
an operating or standby status.
Provide totals for columns (d) and (e) as a last line. The total in column (d) should equal the
value in column (c) on Schedule 2 for the month of the annual peak
demand. The total in column (e) should
equal the value in column (f) on Schedule 3 for the month of the annual peak
demand. Any differences must be
explained in a note. For specific
guidelines, please refer to the attached Schedule 1 Instructions on pages 14
and 15. |
||||||
Line
No. (a) |
Electric
Utility Name (b) |
Plant
Name (c) |
Plant Available
Capability at the Hour of the (d) |
Integrated
Net Load on the Plant at the Hour of the (e) |
||
1. |
12 |
14 |
||||
2. |
COCHRANE |
54 |
24 |
|||
3. |
COLSTRIP 1 & 2 |
300 |
273 |
|||
4. |
COLSTRIP 3 & 4 |
216 |
208 |
|||
5. |
CORETTE |
160 |
152 |
|||
6. |
HAUSER |
11 |
10 |
|||
7. |
HOLTER |
24 |
22 |
|||
8. |
KERR |
185 |
186 |
|||
9. |
|
9 |
9 |
|||
10. |
MILLTOWN |
0 |
2 |
|||
11. |
MORONY |
48 |
23 |
|||
12. |
|
12 |
9 |
|||
13 |
RAINBOW |
32 |
24 |
|||
14 |
RYAN |
55 |
42 |
|||
15 |
|
87 |
89 |
|||
16 |
0 |
0 |
||||
17 |
MT DEPT./NATURAL RESOURCES |
8 |
4 |
|||
18 |
COLSTRIP ENERGY LTD.
PARTNERSH |
|
0 |
0 |
||
19 |
BILLINGS GENERATION INC. |
BGI |
52 |
24 |
||
20 |
|
CANYON FERRY |
26 |
33 |
||
21 |
VARIOUS SMALL POWER PROD |
|
4 |
1 |
||
|
TOTAL |
1295 |
1149 |
|||
Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission FERC Form No. 714
(1999) |
Annual Electric Control and Planning Area Report For the
Year Ending December 31, 2002 |
Please Type: Utility Code Utility Name |
|||||||||
Part II - Schedule 2. Control Area Monthly Capabilities at Time
of Monthly Peak Demand |
|||||||||||
The peak demand and other terms used in this schedule
are defined in the attached instructions for Schedule 2, pages 15 through
18. Please first read the
instructions, then complete this Schedule. The value in column (c) for the month of the annual peak
demand should equal the total in column (d) in Schedule 1. Any difference must be explained in a note. |
|||||||||||
|
|
Net Capability
at the Time of the Monthly Peak Demand, Based on Control Area Net Energy For
Load (NEL) |
|||||||||
|
|
Net
Capability from Plants Reported on Schedule II |
External
to the Control Area Net
Unit or Firm Capability (MW) |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Unavailable
Capability Due to: |
|
|
|
|||||
Line
No. (a) |
Month (b) |
Available Capability (MW) (c) |
Planned Outage
and Derating (MW) (d) |
Unplanned Outage
and Derating (MW) (e) |
Other Outage
and Derating* (MW) (f) |
Total (c + d
+ e + f) (MW) (g) |
Available (MW) (h) |
Not
Available (MW) (i) |
Total
Capability (g + h
+ i) (MW) (j) |
||
1. |
Jan |
1167 |
16 |
385 |
0 |
1568 |
56 |
|
1625 |
||
2. |
Feb |
1416 |
21 |
103 |
0 |
1540 |
(6) |
|
1534 |
||
3. |
Mar |
1342 |
16 |
182 |
0 |
1540 |
(13) |
|
1527 |
||
4. |
Apr |
1425 |
43 |
63 |
0 |
1531 |
7 |
|
1538 |
||
5. |
May |
1366 |
10 |
38 |
0 |
1574 |
(154) |
|
1420 |
||
6. |
Jun |
1000 |
10 |
409 |
0 |
1579 |
(25) |
|
1554 |
||
7. |
Jul |
1295 |
10 |
257 |
0 |
1562 |
(34) |
|
1528 |
||
8. |
Aug |
1454 |
13 |
92 |
0 |
1559 |
(169) |
|
1390 |
||
9. |
Sep |
1363 |
13 |
166 |
0 |
1542 |
(169) |
|
1373 |
||
10. |
Oct |
1286 |
19 |
254 |
0 |
1559 |
(94) |
|
1465 |
||
11. |
Nov |
1029 |
23 |
508 |
0 |
1560 |
(94) |
|
1466 |
||
12. |
Dec |
1460 |
29 |
68 |
0 |
1557 |
(50) |
|
1507 |
||
* Reductions in capability due to fuel supply problems,
environmental restrictions, lack of transmission availability at a generating
plant, etc. |
|||||||||||
Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission FERC Form No. 714
(1999) |
Annual Electric Control and Planning Area Report For the
Year Ending December 31, 2002 |
Please Type: Utility Code Utility Name |
||||||||||
Part II - Schedule 3. Control Area Net Energy for Load and Peak
Demand Sources by Month |
||||||||||||
Enter the monthly "Net Energy for Load" which
is the amount of energy that the control area requires internally including
control area losses. The total in
column (d) should equal the difference in the totals for columns (e) and (f)
on Schedule 5. The value in column (f)
for the month of the annual peak demand should equal the total in column (e)
in Schedule 1. Any differences must be
explained in a note. For detailed
instructions and definitions, please refer to attached Schedule 3
Instructions on pages 19 and 20. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Control
Area Load Sources at Time of Control Area Monthly Peak Demand, Based on Net Energy For Load (NEL) |
|
||||||
Line No. (a) |
Month (b) |
Control
Area Net
Generation (MWh) (c) |
Net
Actual Interchange (MWh) (d) |
Net
Energy for Load (MWh) (c + d) (e) |
Output
of Generating Plants (MW) (f) |
Unit or
Firm Purchases (MW) (g) |
Unit or
Firm Sales (MW) (h) |
Net
Non-Firm & Inadvertent (MW) (i) |
Monthly Peak
Demand (MW) (f+g-h+i) (j) |
Monthly
Minimum Demand (MW) (k) |
||
1. |
January |
811587 |
11914 |
823501 |
1117 |
128 |
72 |
140 |
1313 |
811 |
||
2. |
February |
825162 |
109383 |
934545 |
1245 |
148 |
154 |
115 |
1354 |
830 |
||
3. |
March |
952528 |
155815 |
1108343 |
1235 |
98 |
111 |
117 |
1339 |
803 |
||
4. |
April |
897108 |
198519 |
1095627 |
1316 |
98 |
91 |
(65) |
1258 |
738 |
||
5. |
May |
892366 |
180107 |
1072473 |
1319 |
0 |
154 |
16 |
1181 |
741 |
||
6. |
June |
651908 |
(85756) |
566152 |
952 |
0 |
25 |
457 |
1384 |
785 |
||
7. |
July |
740620 |
(96196) |
644424 |
1149 |
60 |
94 |
352 |
1467 |
825 |
||
8. |
August |
921557 |
162401 |
1083958 |
1301 |
0 |
169 |
124 |
1256 |
793 |
||
9. |
September |
816464 |
122091 |
938555 |
1244 |
0 |
169 |
162 |
1237 |
731 |
||
10. |
October |
801952 |
51363 |
853315 |
1178 |
0 |
94 |
262 |
1346 |
785 |
||
11. |
November |
857279 |
115231 |
972510 |
1167 |
0 |
94 |
183 |
1256 |
802 |
||
12. |
December |
872874 |
62118 |
934992 |
1147 |
0 |
50 |
237 |
1334 |
832 |
||
13. |
Total |
10041405 |
986990 |
11028395 |
|
|||||||
Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission FERC Form No. 714
(1999) |
Annual Electric Control and Planning Area Report For the
Year Ending December 31, 2002 |
Please Type: Utility Code Utility Name |
|||
Part II - Schedule 4. Adjacent Control Area Interconnections |
|||||
Identify on this schedule: each adjacent control area with
which the respondent control area is interconnected in column (b), all the
interconnection line or bus names with the adjacent control area in column
(c), and the line or bus voltage in column (d). See Schedule 4 Instructions on pages 20 and 21. |
|||||
Line No. (a) |
Name of
Adjacent Control Area (b) |
Control
Area Interconnection Line or
Bus Names (c) |
Line or
Bus Voltage (kV) (d) |
||
1. |
BONNEVILLE
POWER ADMINISTRATION |
ANACONDA/GARRISON/KERR/RATTLESNAKE |
230/230
& 500/115/230 |
||
2. |
PACIFICORP
(EAST) |
RIMROCK/YELLOWTAIL/ANTELOPE/BIG
GRASSY |
161/230/230/161 |
||
3. |
PORTLAND
GENERAL ELECTRIC |
COLSTRIP |
500/500 |
||
4. |
|
COLSTRIP |
230
& 500/500 |
||
5. |
|
BURKE/HOT
SPRINGS |
115/230 |
||
6. |
|
CROSSOVER/RAINBOW/SHELBY |
230/69
& 161/115 |
||
7. |
PACIFICORP (WEST) |
COLSTRIP |
500/500 |
||
8. |
|
COLSTRIP/BURKE |
500/500/115 |
||
9. |
|
|
|
||
10. |
|
|
|
||
11. |
|
|
|
||
Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission FERC Form No. 714
(1999) |
Annual Electric Control and Planning Area Report For the
Year Ending December 31, 2002 |
Please Type: Utility Code Utility Name |
|||||
Part II - Schedule 5. Control Area Scheduled and Actual Interchange |
|||||||
Identify on this schedule: each control area with which the
respondent control area has actual or scheduled interchange of energy, in
column (b); the total annual megawatthours (MWh) of the scheduled interchange that were received by
the respondent control area through all interconnection points with each
control area, in column (c); the MWh of scheduled interchange delivered to each control
area, in column (d); the MWh of total annual actual
interchange received and delivered within each adjacent control area, in columns (e) and (f). Provide totals for columns (c), (d), (e)
and (f). The difference in the totals
for columns (e) and (f) should equal the total in column (d) on Schedule
3. Any difference must be explained in
a note. See Schedule 5 Instructions on
page 21. |
|||||||
Line No. |
Name of
Control Area |
Scheduled
Interchange Between
Control Areas (MWh) |
Actual
Interchange Between Adjacent Control Areas (MWh) |
||||
(a) |
(b) |
Received (c) |
Delivered (d) |
Received
(e) |
Delivered (f) |
||
1. |
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION |
2,688,422 |
10,857,553 |
3,061,272 |
10,893,205 |
||
2. |
PACIFICORP (EAST) |
576,764 |
1,969,963 |
354,872 |
1,104,809 |
||
3. |
PACIFICORP (WEST) |
958,026 |
0 |
958,026 |
0 |
||
4. |
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC |
1,860,094 |
0 |
1,860,094 |
0 |
||
5. |
PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT |
4,509,167 |
0 |
4,509,167 |
0 |
||
6. |
WASHINGTON WATER POWER |
1,697,441 |
571,750 |
1,437,596 |
758,178 |
||
7. |
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION (UPPER MISSOURI) |
789,400 |
668,573 |
1,060,560 |
1,472,385 |
||
8. |
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION (LOWER
MISSOURI) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
9. |
|
|
|
|
|
||
10. |
TOTAL |
13,079,314 |
14,067,839 |
13,241,587 |
14,228,577 |
||
Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission FERC Form No. 714
(1999) |
Annual Control Area and Electric System Report For the
Year Ending December 31, 2002 |
Please Type: Utility Code Utility Name |
|
Part II - Schedule 6. Control Area System Lambda Data |
|||
Submit
on a 3.5 inch diskette formatted for the DOS operating system the following
data file in ASCII format: the control
area's system lambda for each hour of the year starting with 1 a.m., January
1, 1999. Identify clearly the time
zone in which this time series is made.
The file should have 8760 records (8784 for leap years). Each record is to contain the system lambda
value at the clock hour in dollars per megawatthour
(mills per kilowatthour) or an "NA" for
those hours when system lambda was not calculated. Control
Area Hourly System Lambda. For control areas where demand following is
primarily performed by thermal generating units, the system lambda is derived
from the economic dispatch function associated with automatic generation
control performed at the controlling utility or pool control center. Excluding transmission losses, the fuel
cost ($/hr) for a set of on-line and loaded thermal generating units (steam
and gas turbines) is minimum [1] when each unit is loaded and operating at the
same incremental fuel cost ($/MWh) [2] with the sum of the unit loadings (MW) equal to
the system demand plus the net of interchange with other control areas. This single incremental cost of energy is
the system lambda. System lambdas are
likely recalculated many times in one clock hour. However, the indicated system lambda
occurring on each clock hour would be sufficient for reporting purposes. |
Provide,
as a note in Part IV, an explanation describing the reason for the
unavailability of system lambda information and a definite plan for reporting
the information with a target date.
The Commission expects that all Energy Management Systems, with proper
instructions, can record the system lambda being used for economic dispatch of
the control area's thermal units. Respondents
should be able to report system lambda, along with the other information
reported on a control area basis, that describe the
operation of such areas from information that should be readily
available. The Commission is not
requesting Respondents to develop incremental or marginal cost (either short
or long term) according to any formula.
Nor is the Commission requesting "avoided cost rates" that,
pursuant to PURPA 210, electric utilities file with state commissions or
otherwise make available for prospective qualified facilities. Description
of Economic Dispatch. Also, provide in writing a detailed
description of how Respondent calculates system lambda. For those systems that do not use an economic
dispatch algorithm and do not have a system lambda, provide in writing a
detailed description of how control area resources are efficiently
dispatched. |
||
Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission FERC Form No. 714
(1999) |
Annual Electric Control and Planning Area Report For the
Year Ending |
Please Type: Utility Code Utility Name |
|||
Part III - Schedule 1. Electric Utilities That Compose the
Planning Area (Use continuation
sheets if needed) |
|||||
Enter the name of each entity, including the respondent,
that forms the planning area for which this report is being prepared and
their coincident summer and winter peak demands in megawatts. Please refer to Instructions on pages 23
and 24 . |
|||||
|
|
Electric
Utility Coincident Peak Demand (MW) |
|||
Line No. (a) |
Electric
Utility Name (b) |
Summer (c) |
Winter (d) |
||
1. |
|
|
|
||
2. |
|
|
|
||
3. |
|
|
|
||
4. |
|
|
|
||
5. |
|
|
|
||
6. |
|
|
|
||
7. |
|
|
|
||
8. |
|
|
|
||
9. |
|
|
|
||
10.. |
|
|
|
||
Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission FERC Form No. 714
(1999) |
Annual Electric Control and Planning Area Report For the
Year Ending |
Please Type: Utility Code Utility Name |
|
Part III - Schedule 2. Planning Area Hourly Demand and Forecast Summer
and |
|||
PLANNING AREA HOURLY DEMAND (1) Respondents must submit hourly demand data in electronic form
to the Commission. Additionally,
Respondents that participate in a national, regional or subregional
process for consolidating and ensuring the consistency and accuracy of actual
hourly and forecast demand information, may instead authorize the national,
regional or subregional organization to release
that information to the Commission, and to the public at the cost of
reproduction, in an easily accessible electronic format, such as the EEI format. (2) If the Respondent does not participate in the development of
national, regional or subregional actual and
forecast demand information, it must submit its own, equivalent, demand
information directly to the Commission along with this report, as follows. |
Respondents must submit on a
3.5 inch diskette formatted for the DOS operating system the following data
file in ASCII format: the planning
area's actual hourly demand, in megawatts, for each hour of the year starting
with PLANNING AREA FORECAST SUMMER AND Provide on the diskette a file
containing the planning area's forecast summer and winter peak demand, in
megawatts, and annual net energy for load, in megawatthours,
for the next ten years. |
||
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission FERC Form No. 714
(1999) |
Annual Electric Control and Planning Area Report For the
Year Ending |
Please Type: Utility Code Utility Name |
|||
Part IV. Notes |
|||||
Indicate a note by placing an asterisk (*) next to the
entry on Schedules 1 through 6 of Part II and Schedules 1 and 2 of Part III,
and then provide the note below. For
each note, enter the page number in Column (a), the line number in Column
(b), the column letter in Column (c), and the Note in Column (d). Use more than one line if needed. |
|||||
Page No. (a) |
Line No. (b) |
Column Letter (c) |
Notes (d) |
||
|
|
|
NorthWestern
Energy (NWE) does not compute system lambda as described in the instructions
for this report. NWE”S dispatchable resources are
hydroelectric plants and coal-fired thermal plants. Automatic generation
control (AGC) is provided by NWE”S hydro plants or by contracts with
neighboring utilities. Because of their low fuel costs, NWE’s thermal plants
are not included in the AGC algorithm and typically loaded to their maximum
capabilities with any resulting surplus energy sold to other utilities.
During some months of the year (generally May and June), regional
hydroelectric production may make it economic for NWE to reduce thermal
generation during off-peak hours. If this occurs, thermal generation is
dispatched on a merit-order basis, but ACG continues to be provided by hydro
plants or by contracts. |
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
[1] Some utilities may also include variable operation and maintenance costs that they consider "dispatchable." Therefore the costs to be minimized could include a variable O&M component as well as the fuel costs.
[2] Because unit heat rates and fuel costs vary, some units may not be able to operate at the same incremental fuel cost as the other units and, thus, those units may be loaded differently.