Stingray Pipeline Company, L. L. C.

Third Revised Volume No. 1

 Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index



Effective Date: 08/01/2001, Docket: RP01-473-000, Status: Effective

Fifth Revised Sheet No. 123 Fifth Revised Sheet No. 123 : Effective

Superseding: Fourth Revised Sheet No. 123






(b) The Plant Delivery Point shall be included

as Interruptible Points to all Rate

Schedules FTS, FTS-2 and ITS Agreements.


(c) Acceptance of the processing plant(s)

nominations are subject to the normal

confirmation procedures.


(d) No additional transport fee shall be

assessed on interim volumes transported

from the processing plant(s).


(e) For purposes of Section 11, to determine

whether monthly imbalances exist, the

total of all initial and interim receipts

will be compared to the total of all

interim and ultimate deliveries under a

specific Agreement.


(f) Receipt Point nominations and flows at

processing plants with multiple inlets and

outlets shall be included in determining

charges under Section 10 of these General

Terms and Conditions.




As part of the nomination and transfer

nomination process, if there is more than one

supply source nominated to be delivered to a

single Delivery Point or buyer, the nomination

or transfer nomination should identify how and

which supply sources should be cut in the event

all nominated deliveries are not or cannot be

made. Similarly, the nomination or transfer

nomination should identify which delivery should

be cut in the event gas is not or cannot be

received as nominated (i.e., ranking). Ranking

should be included in the list of data elements.

Transportation service providers should use

service requester provided rankings when making

reductions during the scheduling process when

this does not conflict with tariff-based rules.