Stingray Pipeline Company, L. L. C.

Third Revised Volume No. 1

 Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index



Effective Date: 11/01/2008, Docket: RP08-436-000, Status: Effective

First Revised Sheet No. 111 First Revised Sheet No. 111

Superseding: Original Revised Sheet No. 111




(1) If, during scheduling, allocation is necessary

within a customer class, available capacity

shall be allocated, within applicable MDQs, on

the basis of the rates being paid with the

Shippers paying the higher rates receiving the

higher allocation.


(2) If curtailment is necessary, such curtailment

shall be on the basis of the rate paid with the

Shipper paying the lowest rate fully curtailed

before any other Shipper, then the Shipper

paying the next lowest rate, and so on. If more

than one Shipper is paying the same rate and

there is insufficient capacity to serve all such

Shippers after curtailing all Shippers paying

the same rate, curtailment of such Shippers

paying the same rate shall be pro rata, based on

each Shipper's confirmed nomination at that

Interruptible Point.


(f) Once service under a firm Rate Schedule has commenced

during a Month at the Interruptible Point, the service

will not be interrupted during that Month as a result

of subsequent nominations for Interruptible Point

service except as follows: (1) properly submitted and

confirmed mid-month firm service nominations at Firm

Points will supersede any Interruptible Point service

outside the path or where there is a constraint at the

point; and (2) properly submitted and confirmed mid-

month nominations at Interruptible Points within a

path created by Firm Points will supersede

Interruptible Point service outside the path unless

the capacity constraint is only at the point.

Confirmed mid-month nominations within MDQ at an

Interruptible Point by a holder of firm service will

interrupt service at that point under any

interruptible Rate Schedule.