skip navigation
Text Size small medium large  

Legal Resources Arrow Court Cases Arrow New Petitions

 
New Petitions


Many Commission decisions are challenged or enforced in the Federal courts. The Office of the Solicitor, OGC, has independent authority to defend the Commission in court, typically the U.S. Courts of Appeals, unless the matter goes to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The defense normally entails preparing motions and briefs and presenting oral arguments before three-judge panels. It may also involve responding to petitions for writ of mandamus and requests to stay the underlying Commission action. At times, the Office files briefs as a "friend of the court," and in certain limited circumstances also defends the Commission or enforces its initiatives in the U.S. district courts.

  1. Northern California Power Agency, et al. v. FERC
    No. 09-1156, et al. (D.C. Cir. filed 5/29/2009 and later)

    • Order on remand from Bonneville Power Admin. v. FERC, 422 F.3d 908 (9th Cir. 2005), rescinding refund obligation of certain non-public utility entities participating in California ISO and PX markets prior to June 20, 2001, and clarifying pricing formulations in California ISO and PX tariffs. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Sellers of Energy, et al., 121 FERC ¶ 61,067 PDF (2007), on clar., 121 FERC ¶ 61,188 PDF (2007), reh’g denied, 127 FERC ¶ 61,191 PDF (2009).
      FERC Docket No. EL00-95, et al.
      Assigned to: Robert Solomon
      Status: motions


  2. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. FERC
    No. 09-1141 (D.C. Cir. filed 5/18/2009)

    • Obligation of each transmission organization that is a public utility, pursuant to new FPA section 217, to make available long-term firm transmission rights that satisfy various guidelines to load-serving entities. Long-Term Firm Transmission Rights in Organized Electricity Markets, Order No. 681, 116 FERC ¶ 61,077 PDF (2006), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,226 (2006), reh’g denied, 117 FERC ¶ 61,201 PDF (2006), reh’g denied, 126 FERC ¶ 61,254 PDF (2009).
      FERC Docket No. RM06-8
      Assigned to: Samuel Soopper
      Status: in abeyance


  3. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. FERC
    No. 09-1142 (D.C. Cir. filed 5/18/2009)

    • Revisions to California ISO Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade Tariff, concerning short-term financial transmission rights (or congestion revenue rights) and long-term firm transmission rights. California Independent System Operator Corp., 124 FERC ¶ 61,095 PDF (2008), reh’g denied, 126 FERC ¶ 61,233 PDF (2009).
      FERC Docket No. ER07-869, et al.
      Assigned to: Samuel Soopper
      Status: in abeyance


  4. Northern California Power Agency, et al. v. FERC
    Nos. 09-71514, et al. (9th Cir. filed 5/15/2009)

    • Conditional approval of contested settlement agreement, distributing funds, from earlier settlements of Gaming and Partnership Proceedings, paid into FERC-controlled accounts to various entities. Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C., et al.,, 125 FERC ¶ 61,345 PDF (2008) order on reh’g, 126 FERC ¶ 61,234 PDF (2009).
      FERC Docket No. EL03-152, et al.


  5. Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC
    No. 09-1134 (D.C. Cir. filed 5/12/2009)

    • Denial of motion filed by Hoopa Valley Tribe to impose interim license conditions, during relicensing proceeding, to impose ramping rate and minimum flow conditions to protect trout. PacifiCorp, 125 FERC ¶ 61,196 PDF (2008), reh’g denied, 126 FERC ¶ 61,236 PDF (2009).
      FERC Docket No. P-2082
      Assigned to: Samuel Soopper
      Status: awaiting schedule


  6. Missouri Public Service Comm’n v. FERC
    No. 09-1121 (D.C. Cir. filed 4/16/2009)

    • Abandonment and certificate authorizations to certain natural gas pipelines reorganizing into a single FERC-regulated interstate natural gas company; ratemaking and preemption issues. Missouri Interstate Gas, LLC, et al., 119 FERC ¶ 61,074 PDF (2007), order on reh'g & compl., 122 FERC ¶ 61,136 PDF (2008), reh’g denied, 127 FERC ¶ 61,011 PDF (2009).
      FERC Docket No. CP06-407, et al.


  7. In re: City of Idaho Falls, Idaho, et al.
    No. 09-1120 (D.C. Cir. filed 4/14/2009)

    • Emergency Motion for Stay of updated list of charges hydropower licensees must pay for their use of federal lands. Update of the FERC’s Fee Schedule for Annual Charges for the Use of Government Lands, 74 Fed. Reg. 8184 PDF (Feb. 17, 2009).
      FERC Docket No. RM09-6


  8. Washington Gas Light Co. v. FERC
    No. 09-1100 (D.C. Cir. filed 3/13/2009)

    • Order on remand from Washington Gas Light Co. v. FERC, 532 F.3d 928 (D.C. Cir. 2008), reauthorizing expansion of Cove Point LNG’s existing LNG import terminal and construction of Dominion’s new downstream pipeline and storage facilities; effect on gas leaks on WGL’s system. Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP, et al., 125 FERC ¶ 61,018 PDF (2008), order on reh’g and clar., 126 FERC ¶ 61,036 PDF (2009).
      FERC Docket No. CP05-130, et al.


  9. Calpine Energy Services, L.P. v. FERC
    No. 09-1091 (D.C. Cir. filed 3/4/2009)

    • Revised tariff sheets proposing new tariff provisions regarding gas quality and interchangeability. Maritime & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C., 125 FERC ¶ 61,159 PDF (2008), order on reh'g, 126 FERC ¶ 61,119 PDF (2009).
      FERC Docket No. RP08-374




  Related Topics

 



Updated: June 29, 2009