U-T Offshore System, L.L.C.
Third Revised Volume No. 1
Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index
Effective Date: 06/01/1997, Docket: RP97-146-001, Status: Effective
Second Revised Sheet No. 63 Second Revised Sheet No. 63 : Superseded
Superseding: First Revised Sheet No. 63
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
(Continued)
(g) The Qualified Bid must commit to payment of the maximum commodity charge
for Rate Schedule FT service, as set forth on Sheet No. 4 of this tariff,
in connection with use of the capacity to be released, as well as all
other applicable add-on charges and surcharges under U-TOS' tariff,
including, but not limited to, any F.E.R.C. Order No. 636 commodity-based
transition cost recovery surcharge.
17.7 Procedures for Allocation of Released Capacity.
(a) U-TOS shall rank all bids and select the "best bid" or "better offer" as
defined in subsection 17.7(b) from among the bids received. However, if
more than one bidder submits the "best bid" or "better offer," the first
bidder in time, inclusive of the Prearranged Shipper, shall be selected
and posted as the "best bid" or "better offer," unless the Releasing
Shipper specifies another tie-breaking methodology in its Release
Proposal. If multiple bids meeting minimum conditions have been
submitted, bids shall be awarded best bid or better offer first, until all
offered capacity is awarded. Any bid submitted for released capacity
pursuant to Section 17.6 may state that its acceptance is contingent;
provided, the Release Proposal allows the submission of contingent bids
pursuant to subsection 17.4 of this Section 17. The Replacement or
Prearranged Shipper submitting the contingent bid shall have a reasonable
time, as specified by the Releasing Shipper, within which to eliminate the
contingency or withdraw its bid. The Replacement or Prearranged Shipper
may eliminate the contingency by notifying U-TOS of such elimination via
U-TOS' Electronic Delivery Mechanism no later than 3 p.m. Central Time on
the business day prior to the nomination deadline for the effective date
of the release. If the Replacement or Prearranged Shipper fails to notify
U-TOS that the contingency is not eliminated within such time, such
contingent bid shall be deemed rejected by U-TOS for failure to eliminate
the contingency in accordance with the Releasing Shipper's Release
Proposal. Any Replacement Shipper may make an upward revision to or
withdraw its bid during the bid period; provided, U-TOS will allow any
Prearranged Shipper to match, in accordance with subsection 17.7(c), the
"best bid" or "better offer" after the close of the bid period; however,
if the Replacement Shipper submits more than one bid for the same
capacity, the lower bid will automatically expire. Replacement Shipper
shall not have the opportunity to use its ability to withdraw its bid in
order to submit a lower bid, if its submitted bid is higher than necessary
to obtain the capacity.
(b) "Best Bid" or "Better Offer." The "best bid" or "better offer" shall be
(1) determined in accordance with the bid evaluation method specified by
the Releasing Shipper pursuant to subsection 17.4; or (2) in the event the
Releasing Shipper elects not to submit a bid evaluation method, the "best
bid" or "better offer" shall be selected from among the Qualified Bid(s)
received during the bid period, including any extension thereof, in
accordance with the following procedures:
(i) U-TOS shall calculate the Net Present Value of all Qualified Bids
and applicable Prearranged Transactions by applying the proposed
reservation charge to the amount of capacity proposed to be taken
for the proposed duration of the capacity release transaction, and
discounting resultant dollar figure to present value on the basis of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission interest rate described in
18 CFR 154.67(c)(2)(iii)(A) that is in effect on the date