Canyon Creek Compression Company
Third Revised Volume No. 1
Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index
Effective Date: 09/24/2001, Docket: RP01-515-000, Status: Effective
Third Revised Sheet No. 124 Third Revised Sheet No. 124 : Effective
Superseding: Second Revised Sheet No. 124
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
10. DETERMINATION OF DAILY RECEIPTS
10.1 To the extent feasible, all volumes received by Canyon at a
Receipt Point shall be allocated in accordance with the confirmed
nominations for that point. In the event the actual volumes received by
Canyon do not equal the confirmed nominations for that point, any
underage or overage will be allocated as follows:
(a) First, in accordance with the effective predetermined
allocations (PDAs) submitted by those entities (Allocators) owning or
controlling the gas being delivered to Canyon. An operational balancing
agreement (OBA) is one type of a PDA. Shipper agrees that such an
allocation is binding on Shipper.
(b) Then, if there is no effective PDA, pro rata to the
extent applicable based on confirmed nominations or transfer
nominations, as applicable. Shipper agrees that such an allocation is
binding on Shipper.
10.2 The upstream or downstream party providing the point
confirmation should submit the PDA to the allocating party after or
during confirmation and before the start of the gas Day, except that no
other PDAs need be submitted if an OBA is in effect at a point. Unless
otherwise agreed, all PDAs must be submitted to Canyon through its
Interactive Website or through EDI before the start of the gas Day the
PDA is to be effective. Such PDA shall specify how any underage or
overage from the confirmed nominated volumes should be allocated among
the entities listed on the PDA. Canyon shall acknowledge receipt and
acceptance of the PDA via its Interactive Website if received through
its Interactive Website or via EDI if received via EDI. Such
notification of acknowledgment and acceptance will be within fifteen
(15) minutes of receipt. Canyon's acceptance is contingent on Canyon
being able to administer the allocation submitted by the Allocator.
Allocation methodology types upon which two parties may agree are:
ranked, pro rata, percentages, swing and operator provided value.
Other examples of allocation methods which can be used are matching of
supply sources with specified customers and combinations of methodology
types. Different methods may be submitted for overages and underages.
If the parties cannot agree, Section 10.1(b) shall apply.