Midwestern Gas Transmission Company

Third Revised Volume No. 1

 Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index

 

 

Effective Date: 05/10/2010, Docket: RP10-587-000, Status: Pending

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 246B Sixth Revised Sheet No. 246B

Superseding: Fifth Revised Sheet No. 246B

 

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

 

 

 

15. FLEXIBLE POINT RIGHTS AND SEGMENTATION (Continued)

 

15.2 Point Capacity Scheduling Rights (Continued)

 

15.2.3 Obligation Under Relocation of Primary Scheduling Rights (Continued)

 

accordance with Section 5 of Rate Schedule(s) FT-A, FT-B, FT-C, FT-D or

FT-GS, shall not be affected by the relocation of primary scheduling

rights.

 

15.2.4 Secondary/Interruptible Capacity Scheduling Rights

 

 

The Receipt Points and Delivery Points within a Rate Schedule FT-A, FT-

B, FT-C or FT-D Shipper's Transportation Path that do not have primary

capacity scheduling rights are automatically assigned SIP capacity

scheduling rights by Company.

 

The Receipt Points within a Rate Schedule FT-GS Shipper's

Transportation Path that do not have primary capacity scheduling rights

are automatically assigned SIP capacity scheduling rights by Company.

 

The Receipt Points and Delivery Points outside of a Rate Schedule FT-A,

FT-B, FT-C or FT-D Shipper's Transportation Path are automatically

assigned SOP capacity scheduling rights by Company.

 

The Receipt Points outside of a Rate Schedule FT-GS Shipper's

Transportation Path are automatically assigned SOP capacity scheduling

rights by Company.

 

The Receipt Points and Delivery Points under an Interruptible Rate

Schedule IT Transportation Agreement share equal interruptible

scheduling priority rights.

 

15.3 Segmentation Rights

 

15.3.1 Segmentation via Nominations

 

A Rate Schedule FT-A, FT-B, FT-C, FT-D or IT Shipper, or its Agent, may

segment its transportation agreement into separate parts for its own

use through the nomination process, to the extent such segmentation is

operationally feasible. The primary scheduling rights for a segment

shall be relocated in accordance with Subsection 15.2.2 hereof.

 

Company will not permit a Rate Schedule FT-A, FT-B, FT-C, FT-D or IT

Shipper, or its Agent, to segment capacity via the nomination process

when the nominations by such party exceed the Transportation Quantity

of the underlying transportation agreement at any mainline location,

within or outside of its Transportation Path for a given nomination

cycle. Nominations of gas quantities in opposing flow directions to

the same point location may overlap at such point to the extent

individual nominated gas quantities do not exceed the Transportation

Quantity.

 

If Company determines that a Shipper, or its Agent, has nominated a

transportation agreement in a way that is not operationally feasible,

Company shall notify the nominating party, in writing, at the time the

nomination is rejected. In such notice, Company shall describe why the

nomination was denied for operational reason(s).