Midwestern Gas Transmission Company

Third Revised Volume No. 1

 Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index

 

 

Effective Date: 07/01/2003, Docket: RP03-400-000, Status: Effective

Third Revised Sheet No. 222 Third Revised Sheet No. 222 : Effective

Superseding: Second Revised Sheet No. 222

 

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

 

 

3. MEASUREMENT REPORTING AND SCHEDULING OF RECEIPTS AND DELIVERIES (Continued)

 

3.4 Allocation of Receipt Delivery Point Measurement (Continued)

 

3.4.3 Allocation of Receipts/Deliveries in Absence of Operational Balancing

Agreement

 

In the absence of a point allocation methodology at a given point as

described above due to the lack of an Operational Balancing Agreement

or for other reasons, the interconnected party shall advise Company,

prior to the commencement of the day, of a Predetermined Allocation

Methodology ("PDA") to be utilized in allocating scheduled receipts or

deliveries among all parties and scheduling services at such points;

provided that such methodology must allocate flows based on scheduled

quantities.

 

Company shall accept NAESB WGQ-approved allocation methodology types

from the upstream or downstream custody transfer party who is providing

the point confirmation. [2.3.19/v1.4]

 

Company shall confirm receipt of the PDA within 15 minutes.

 

Confirmation of receipt of PDAs transmitted via EDI shall be Company's

PDA quick response via EDI.

 

Confirmation of receipt of PDAs transmitted via facsimile shall be the

sending party's facsimile transmission report.

 

In the absence of receipt of a PDA, Company shall allocate quantities

received or delivered at a certain point in proportion to the Scheduled

Quantities.

 

Company shall operate in a manner such that allocated quantities will

equal scheduled quantities for gas quantities into and out of a Title

Transfer Tracking Service Provider from or to a pool(s). Company shall

not be required to accept Pre-determined Allocations for those

transactions nor separately provide, or transmit, Allocations to

parties to such transactions. [1.3.71/v1.5]

 

Where the allocated quantities with respect to a Title Transfer

Tracking Service Provider are different than the scheduled quantities

provided by Company to the Title Transfer Service Provider, for the

same period, the Company shall provide to the Title Transfer Tracking

Service Provider Allocation (NAESB WGQ Standard 2.4.3) for the

quantities into the Title Transfer Tracking Service Provider. In

addition, Company shall either accept:

 

(i) Allocations from the Title Transfer Tracking Service Provider, or,

 

(ii) PDAs from the Title Transfer Tracking Service Provider.

 

Such information shall be delineated at the level of the nomination

line items provided by the Title Transfer Tracking Service Provider to

Company for the purpose of allocating quantities out of the Title

Transfer Tracking Service Provider. [1.3.71/v1.5]