Midwestern Gas Transmission Company

Third Revised Volume No. 1

 Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index

Effective Date: 11/01/2003, Docket: RP03-618-000, Status: Effective

Second Revised Sheet No. 91 Second Revised Sheet No. 91 : Effective

Superseding: First Revised Sheet No. 91

RATE SCHEDULE LMS-MA

LOAD MANAGEMENT SERVICE - DELIVERY POINTS

5. DAILY IMBALANCE CHARGE

5.1 Applicability

(a) Single Point of Interconnection Under LMS-MA Agreement

A Balancing Party shall be subject to a potential Daily Imbalance Charge if

(i) Company lacks the ability to physically control delivered

quantities to the Balancing Party at such interconnect, or

(ii) Company has the ability to physically control delivered quantities

to the Balancing Party at such interconnect but the capability has

been disabled pursuant to a request by the Balancing Party, or

(iii) The Balancing Party either lacks the ability to physically control

receipt quantities from Company at such interconnect or utilizes

its physical flow control capability to deviate from the current

total scheduled nomination at such interconnect without Company's

consent.

(b) Multiple Points of Interconnection Under LMS-MA Agreement

A Balancing Party shall be subject to a potential Daily Imbalance Charge if

(i) Company lacks the ability to physically control delivered

quantities to the Balancing Party at all of the interconnects

specified in the Balancing Party's LMS-MA Agreement, or

(ii) Company has the ability to physically control delivered quantities

to the Balancing Party at one or more of the interconnects

specified in the Balancing Party's LMS-MA Agreement but the

capability has been disabled at such location(s) pursuant to a

request by the Balancing Party, or

(iii) Company lacks the ability to physically control delivered

quantities to the Balancing Party at the specific interconnect

designated to assume the imbalances by the Balancing Party

(balancing "swing" interconnect) under the Balancing Party's

LMS-MA Agreement, or

(iv) The Balancing Party lacks the ability to physically control receipt

quantities from Company at any of the interconnects specified in

the Balancing Party's LMS-MA Agreement, or

(v) The Balancing Party utilizes its physical flow control capability

at one or more interconnect locations specified in the Balancing

Party's LMS-MA Agreement to deviate from the current aggregate

scheduled nomination for the such interconnects without Company's

consent.