Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.

Fourth Revised Volume No. 1

 Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index

 

 

Effective Date: 03/01/2010, Docket: RP10-322-000, Status: Effective

Original Sheet No. 104 Original Sheet No. 104

 

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

(Continued)

 

22. NOMINATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES

(Continued)

 

22.7 Unconfirmed Nominations

 

(i) With respect to the timely nomination/confirmation

process at a receipt or delivery point, in the absence of

agreement to the contrary, the lesser of the confirmation

quantities should be the confirmed quantity. If there is no

response to a Request for Confirmation or an unsolicited

Confirmation Response, the lesser of the

confirmation quantity or the previously scheduled quantity should

be the new confirmed quantity.

 

(ii) With respect to the processing of requests for

increases during the intraday nomination/confirmation process, in

the absence of agreement to the contrary, the lesser of the

confirmation quantities should be the new confirmed quantity. If

there is no response to the Request for Confirmation or an

unsolicited Confirmation Response, the previously scheduled

quantity should be the new confirmed quantity.

 

(iii) With respect to the processing of requests for

decreases during the intraday nomination/confirmation process, in

the absence of agreement to the contrary, the lesser of the

confirmation quantities should be the new confirmed quantity, but

in any event no less than the elapsed- prorated-scheduled

quantity. If there is no response to a Request for Confirmation

or an unsolicited Confirmation Response, the greater of the

confirmation quantity or the elapsed-prorated-scheduled quantity

should be the new confirmed quantity.

 

(iv) With respect to 1.3.22 i, ii, and iii, if there is no

response to a request for confirmation or an unsolicited

confirmation response, the Transportation Service Provider should

provide the Service Requester with the following information to

explain why the nomination failed, as applicable:

 

(1) the Service Requester's Transportation Service

Provider did not conduct the confirmation;

 

(2) the Service Requester is told by its Transportation

Service Provider that the upstream confirming party did not

conduct the confirmation;

 

(3) the Service Requester is told by its Transportation

Service Provider that the upstream Service Requester did not have

the gas or submit the nomination;