Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.

Third Revised Volume No. 1

 Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index

 

 

Effective Date: 02/10/1999, Docket: RP99- 80-001, Status: Effective

Second Revised Sheet No. 276 Second Revised Sheet No. 276 : Effective

Superseding: Sub First Revised Sheet No. 276

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

(continued)

 

26. NOMINATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES

(continued)

 

26.7 Unconfirmed Nominations

 

(i) With respect to the timely nomination/confirmation

process at a receipt or delivery point, in the absence of

agreement to the contrary, the lesser of the confirmation

quantities should be the confirmed quantity. If there is

no response to a Request for Confirmation or an

unsolicited Confirmation Response, the lesser of the

confirmation quantity or the previously scheduled

quantity should be the new confirmed quantity.

 

(ii) With respect to the processing of requests for increases

during the intraday nomination/confirmation process, in

the absence of agreement to the contrary, the lesser of

the confirmation quantities should be the new confirmed

quantity. If there is no response to the Request for

Confirmation or an unsolicited Confirmation Response, the

previously scheduled quantity should be the new confirmed

quantity.

 

(iii) With respect to the processing of requests for decreases

during the intraday nomination/confirmation process, in

the absence of agreement to the contrary, the lesser of

the confirmation quantitites should be the new confirmed

quantity, but in any event no less than the elapsed-

prorated-scheduled quantity. If there is no response to

a Request for Confirmation or an unsolicited Confirmation

Response, the greater of the confirmation quantity or the

elapsed-prorated-scheduled quantity should be the new

confirmed quantity.

 

(iv) With respect to 1.3.22 i, ii, and iii, if there is no

response to a request for confirmation or an unsolicited

confirmation resposne, the Transportation Service

Provider should provide the Service Requester with the

following information to explain why the nomination

failed, as applicable:

 

(1) the Service Requester's Transportation Service

Provider did not conduct the confirmation;

 

(2) the Service Requester is told by its Transportation

Service Provider that the upstream confirming party

did not conduct the confirmation;

 

(3) the Service Requester is told by its Transportation

Service Provider that the upstream Servoce

Requester did not have the gas or submit the

nomination;