Mobile Bay Pipeline Company
Second Revised Volume No. 1
Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index
Effective Date: 08/01/1998, Docket: RP98-329-000, Status: Effective
Third Revised Sheet No. 185 Third Revised Sheet No. 185 : Effective
Superseding: Superseding Second Revised Sheet No. 185
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1.3.17 If requested by a shipper or supplier on a transportation service
provider’s system, the transportation service provider should offer at
least one pool.
1.3.18 Deliveries from receipt points should be able to be delivered
directly into at least one pool and delivery points should be able
to receive quantities from at least one pool, excluding non-contiguous
1.3.23 Ranking should be included in the list of data elements.
Transportation service providers should use service requester provider
rankings when making reductions during the scheduling process when
this does not conflict with tariff-based rules.
1.3.24 When used, Package ID should be supported for nominating, scheduling,
confirming, allocating , and invoicing (sales and purchase), and not
required for transportation invoicing.
1.3.25 Use of the Package ID is at the discretion of the service requester,
and if sent, should be accepted and processed by the service provider.
1.3.27 The key should be composed of: service requester contract (Service
Agreement), transaction type, upstream party, upstream contract (when
applicable), receipt location (as applicable), downstream party, (as
applicable) downstream contract (when applicable), delivery location
(as applicable), package ID, capacity type indicator (where mutually
agreed), service provider activity code (where mutually agreed). Upon
receipt by a service provider from a service requester of a
transaction whose key elements match those previously received by the
service provider from the service requester, the service provider
should then process the begin date/time and end date/time consistent
with the intentions of the standard 1.3.7 and then process the rest of
the transaction’s data elements consistent with the applicable
standards to determine the business results. When data is not
supplied (e.g. is not applicable, is not supported or is not mutually
agreed upon) the pertinent portion to the key would be determined to
1.3.28 For current in-kind fuel reimbursement procedures, fuel rates should
be made effective only at the beginning of the month.
1.3.29 For in-kind fuel reimbursement methods, Service Providers should not
reject a nomination for reasons of rounding differences due to fuel
calculation of less than 5 Dth.
1.3.30 For in-kind fuel reimbursement methods, Service Providers should
provide, if applicable, a fuel matrix for receipt and delivery point
combinations. The Service Requesters should not be responsible for
calculating and totaling fuel based on each zone or facility
1.3.31 The transportation priority for fuel should be the same as the level
of service as the transaction to which it applies.