East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC

Third Revised Volume No. 1

 Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index

 

 

Effective Date: 10/01/2007, Docket: RP00-469-013, Status: Effective

Original Sheet No. 373B Original Sheet No. 373B : Effective

 

 

 

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS (Continued)

 

19. SEGMENTATION

 

19.1 Segmentation by Nomination (Continued)

 

(g) For the purpose of determining, for that portion of

Transporter's system which is subject to segmentation as

provided in Section 19.1(a), whether any overlapping

transactions exceed, in the aggregate (based on all

relevant Shipper utilization), the contract entitlements of

the original firm contract at any point (including, without

limitation, the MDTQ or segment entitlements), a

transaction that involves movement of gas in the same

direction as that contemplated by the Primary Receipt

Point(s) and the Primary Delivery Point(s) on the firm

service agreement and a transaction that involves movement

of gas that is counter to the direction contemplated by the

Primary Receipt Point(s) and the Primary Delivery Point(s)

on the firm service agreement that are nominated to the

same Delivery Point for the same gas flow date and time

shall not be deemed to be an overlap at that Delivery Point

provided that such Delivery Point is the only Delivery

Point covered by an Operational Balancing Agreement

pursuant to Rate Schedule LMS-MA; provided further,

however, in no event shall Transporter be obligated to

deliver on a primary firm basis at that Delivery Point a

quantity in excess of the MDDO applicable to that Delivery

Point. For the purpose of determining whether any

overlapping nominations in a segment exceed, in the

aggregate (based on all relevant Shipper utilization) the

contract entitlements of the original firm contract in any

segment (including, without limitation, the MDTQ or segment

entitlements), a transaction that involves movement of gas

in the same direction as that contemplated by the Primary

Receipt Point(s) and the Primary Delivery Point(s) on the

firm service agreement and a transaction that involves

movement of gas that is counter to the direction

contemplated by the Primary Receipt Point(s) and the

Primary Delivery Point(s) on the firm service agreement

that are nominated on the same segment for the same gas

flow date and time shall be deemed to be an overlap on that

segment.