Discovery Gas Transmission LLC
Original Volume No. 1
Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index
Effective Date: 11/02/1998, Docket: RP99- 45-000, Status: Effective
First Revised Sheet No. 126 First Revised Sheet No. 126 : Effective
Superseding: Original Sheet No. 126
d. Any third party may administer multiple Service
Agreements as the agent for one or more Shippers,
but the agent must make nominations and otherwise
administer and account separately for each Service
Agreement.
5.5 SHIPPER PRIORITIZATION OF NOMINATED QUANTITIES - If
Shipper elects to nominate quantities of Gas to be
received by Transporter from one or more upstream parties
at one or more Receipt Points for delivery by Transporter
to one or more downstream parties at one or more Delivery
Points for the account of Shipper, Shipper shall provide
the priority, method, and extent to which each nominated
receipt quantity from a particular upstream party at a
particular Receipt Point should be reduced in the event
that any downstream Operator verifies and confirms
deliveries that are less than the Shipper's nominated
deliveries, or in the event that, due to Transporter's
allocation of Available Capacity for Transportation
services, all nominated receipts cannot be scheduled.
Likewise, if Shipper elects to nominate quantities of Gas
to be delivered by Transporter to one or more downstream
parties at one or more Delivery Points for the account of
Shipper, Shipper shall provide the priority, method, and
extent to which each nominated delivery quantity to a
particular downstream party at a particular Delivery
Point should be reduced in the event that any upstream
Operator verifies and confirms receipts that are less
than the Shipper's nominated receipts, or in the event
that, due to Transporter's allocation of Available
Capacity for Transportation services, all nominated
deliveries cannot be scheduled.
Shipper prioritization of nominated quantities must be
consistent with the terms of this FERC Gas Tariff and
such prioritization will be honored to the extent that
Transporter reasonably determines such prioritization is
operationally feasible and the conditions of Subsection
8.4 have been met.