Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Company
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1
Contents / Previous / Next / Main Tariff Index
Effective Date: 01/01/2010, Docket: RP10-206-000, Status: Effective
First Revised Sheet No. 385 First Revised Sheet No. 385
Superseding: Original Sheet No. 385
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
(continued)
5.5 Delivery Nominations and Scheduling (continued)
Shipper furnishes delivery nominations for any Day for physical
deliveries in accordance with Rate Schedules FT or IT as well as
deliveries to Storage Points of Injection for service under Rate
Schedules FSS or ISS, and Shipper or its designee fails to provide
adequate quantities of Gas to satisfy its total delivery
nominations, including Fuel Use and LUFG, for such Day,
Transporter will allocate quantities received in a manner such
that nominations for physical deliveries are fully satisfied
first, with any remaining quantities allocated to satisfy the
nominations for deliveries at Storage Points of Injection, unless
Shipper and Transporter agree to another allocation method in the
Service Agreement. Transporter will provide such notification as
may be reasonable in the circumstances when the foregoing
allocation has occurred. If the delivery nominations submitted by
Shipper under this Section 5.5 and those furnished by applicable
Pool Managers under Section 5.3 are inconsistent, such nominations
may be rejected by Transporter or, if accepted, the nomination
will be deemed to be the lowest common quantity shown on the
applicable nomination and schedule. If, for any Day, due to the
failure of any FT-2 Shipper to comply with its MFO(s) under Rate
Schedule FT-2, Transporter does not have sufficient capacity to
schedule nominated quantities of Linked Firm Service, up to the
amount of Linked Firm Service that would have been available had
the FT-2 Shipper complied with its MFO(s), received during the
Timely Nomination Cycle from all Linked Firm Service Shippers
whose capacity is linked to that FT-2 Shipper's MFO(s), then
nominated quantities for the affected Linked Firm Service Shippers
shall be reduced on a pro rata basis based upon quantities
nominated by the affected Linked Firm Service Shippers but not
scheduled during the Timely Nomination Cycle; provided, however,
that affected Linked Firm Service Shipper(s) that do not also hold
the applicable Rate Schedule FT-2 capacity that created the Linked
Firm Service capacity shall have a higher scheduling priority than
the affected Linked Firm Service Shipper that holds the applicable
Rate Schedule FT-2 capacity that created the Linked Firm Service
capacity. Subject to the requirements of Section 10, all
delivery nominations shall be prospective only and may be used by
Transporter for all purposes in the scheduling and operation of
Transporter's system as described in this section, and Transporter
shall not be responsible or liable for taking action in reliance
on such nominations and as described herein.